Hardik's Notes · AI, simply
Does AI help you learn, or just finish the job?
A three-month trial gave lawyers an AI drafting helper. Their work got better. Their own skill grew only for the experienced ones.

What did they test?
A team led by economist David Autor ran a trial with 133 patent lawyers at eleven firms in the United States. A patent is a legal paper that protects an invention.
About two thirds of the lawyers got an AI drafting helper early. The rest were trained on AI but could not use the tool until the study ended. Expert patent attorneys scored all the work without knowing who had used AI.
Google Research wrote about it on 7 October 2026. The paper is a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), which means other experts have not yet reviewed it formally.
What happened?
While using the AI helper
- Drafts scored higher after 10 days
- Still higher after 90 days
- Less experienced lawyers gained the most
After 90 days, with no AI
- A repair task done alone, with no AI
- Experienced lawyers (seven or more years) did clearly better
- Less experienced lawyers showed no clear average gain
The less experienced lawyers did not simply get worse. Their scores spread out. There were fewer middle scores and more poor ones and more good ones.
Why should you care?
You are the lawyer in this story every time you ask a chatbot to help with homework or code. The finished work can look better while your own skill stays the same.
The authors suggest that you may need some solid knowledge first, so that you can judge what the AI gives you. They also saw that experienced lawyers used the AI’s answers as something to check and argue with.
What’s the catch?
- The sample was small: 133 lawyers, all doing one kind of work.
- It lasted three months, and AI tools have changed since.
- The people were professionals. Nobody knows yet if students behave the same way.
Try it
This test is our idea, not the paper’s. Pick a short task, such as a paragraph or a small program. Do it once with AI. A week later, do a similar task with no AI. Ask a friend to mark both against the same list of points, without knowing which was which.
If the second one is much weaker, the AI helped the work and not you. Then try doing the first draft yourself and using AI only to check it.
Sources
- Does AI Assistance Enhance or Erode Expertise? Evidence from a Three-Month Field Experiment in Patent Drafting, Autor and others, NBER Working Paper 35720, 2026
- Does better work always mean better workers?, Google Research, 7 October 2026
- Paper page with abstract, Google Research
Keep reading
Three more from the notebook.
8 October 2026
Every AI chip on one chart: from 2 watts to a data centre
MIT Lincoln Laboratory plots AI chips by speed and power. The chart shows why a camera and a data centre need different chips.Read it8 October 2026
How Google steers an AI image maker without rebuilding it
Ask for a lizard in sunglasses and you may get a lizard with none. Google Research built a small add-on that steers the model.Read it5 October 2026
Open now: 5 contests for students (October 2026)
Five contests students in India can enter now, from a one-weekend NASA hackathon to a 10,000 dollar environment prize. Deadlines from 29 October.Read it
Beyond the notebook
This is what we do in schools.
A year-long programme for classes 6 to 12. Creativity, taught as a skill, inside the classroom you already have, led by your teachers.